Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

Canada tightens fraud and corruption controls on government procurement

By Paul Lalonde and Sean Stephenson
September 16, 2019
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Government Affairs
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Amendments to the Government Contracts Regulations add fraud and corruption certifications for bidders and increases the bidding threshold for construction contracts

On June 10, 2019, amendments to the Government Contracts Regulations (GCRs) entered into force. These changes affect all suppliers engaged in the federal contracting process.

In brief, the GCRs establish rules for federal government bid solicitation and contracts. The amendments to the GCRs affect suppliers in two significant ways. First, all bidders and contractors must now declare that, throughout the solicitation process, they have not committed certain offences related to fraud or corruption. Second, the amendments raise the threshold for non-competed service and construction contracts to CA$40,000 from its previous threshold of CA$25,000.

These two impacts are described in detail below.

1. New deemed provisions on fraud and corruption

The amendments to section 18 of the GCRs require contractors and bidders to declare they have not committed an act that would constitute an offence under certain sections of the Criminal Code, the Financial Administration Act, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, and the Competition Act relating to fraud and corruption throughout the solicitation or contract award process.1 This corresponds to one of the government’s stated objectives when making these amendments, of “reduc[ing] the risk of corruption and collusion” in the procurement process.

Pursuant to section 18 of the GCRs, this declaration is “deemed” included in “every construction, goods or service contract that provides for the payment of money”, as well as in every bid solicitation for such a contract. Prior to the present amendment, section 18 contained other deemed provisions, including declarations that contractors have not been convicted of any offence listed under section 750(3) of the Criminal Code or paid a contingency fee to a consultant or lobbyist subject to reporting requirements under the Lobbying Act.1 Notably, the specific text of these declarations (or wording of similar effect) is usually included in the solicitation itself, and/or through the Standard Acquisition Clauses and Conditions (SACC) Manual included by reference in government contracts. The SACC Manual has yet to be updated to reflect this new deemed declaration.

Where a contractor’s declaration has been determined to be false, the contractor must immediately return any advance payment, and the contracting authority may terminate the contract, and may seek other potential remedies available under the contract.

Practically, this amendment differs from the existing deemed declarations in respect of Criminal Code offences, which, as noted above, are premised on convictions. The amendments solely require that an “act” or “activity” can “constitute an offence” under the applicable provisions. Hence, there is no requirement of a conviction. Absent specific court judgment on the relevant offences, it remains unclear how determinations of an act or activity constituting an offence of the named provisions will be made, who it will be made by, the standard of proof that will be utilized in making such a determination, and the opportunity that will be afforded to suppliers to defend themselves.

While compliance with such provisions will not be problematic for the majority of suppliers, any supplier that believes they may have any compliance issues is best to clarify the specifics of such determinations in contracts entered into with the government. An adverse determination against a supplier made under these provisions may cause significant prejudice to them. In addition to a contract being terminated, suppliers may also be subject to sanctions under the Vendor Performance Corrective Measure Policy that can affect future contract awards.

2. Increase in threshold for competitive bids

The second impactful change to the GCRs increases the threshold for bid solicitation to CA$40,000 for service and construction contracts. This increase accounts for inflation from the time the previous level of CA$25,000 was set in 1996. The threshold for contracts for goods remains fixed at CA$25,000, in light of Canada’s obligations under the Canada Free Trade Agreement.

3. Analysis

The deemed terms noted above are the latest in a series of reforms aimed at corruption in federal government contracting and at white-collar crime, generally. We have previously written about the Integrity Regime, which, as with the amendments noted above, applies to contracting with the federal government. We have also commented on the recent made-in-Canada approach to deferred prosecution agreements.

Other recent developments targeting white collar crime include a broadening of the prohibition against money laundering, and a requirement for federally-incorporated companies to track their significant beneficial owners. The latter initiative attempts to limit misuse of the corporate shield to obscure tax evasion and other misdeeds.

Our team is deeply experienced in procurement and anti-corruption matters. Please contact Paul Lalonde or Sean Stephenson with any inquiries on this or other related matters. 

*Daniel McElroy, Practice Support Lawyer in the Vancouver office, contributed to this alert.


  1. [More specifically, the offences in such declarations include: (i) section 121 (frauds on the government), 124 (selling or purchasing office), 380 (fraud) or 418 (selling defective stores to Her Majesty) of the Criminal Code; (ii) paragraph 80(1)(d) or subsection 80(2) or 154.01(1) of the Financial Administration Act; (iii) section 3 (bribing a foreign public official) or 4 (accounting) of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act; or (iv) section 45 (conspiracies, agreements or arrangements between competitors), 47 (bid-rigging) or 49 (agreements or arrangements of federal financial institutions) of the Competition Act.]↩
  2. [These provisions are unchanged by the amendments, so would-be contractors remain, in essence, debarred if ever convicted under section 750(3), which speaks to fraud and corruption offences, or paid an improper contingency fee.   ]↩
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Paul Lalonde

About Paul Lalonde

Paul Lalonde joined Dentons Canada LLP’s Toronto office in 2014 as a Partner. He focuses on government contracting law, international trade, anti-corruption and international arbitration. Mr. Lalonde is one of Canada’s leading experts on government procurement. He has represented clients in numerous government contracting disputes, including before the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, the Federal Court of Canada and provincial tribunals. His expertise encompasses anti-dumping and countervail investigations, customs, import and export controls, international sanctions, anti-corruption compliance and investigations and international business.

All posts Full bio

Sean Stephenson

About Sean Stephenson

Sean Stephenson is a senior associate in our Corporate group, where he focuses on international trade, investment, anti-corruption, procurement and public international law. Throughout his practice, Sean has gained extensive experience in investment treaty arbitrations, including acting in multiple cases under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules with respect to all phases of proceedings in complex disputes in the Americas and Europe. He has acted in and advised on cases under the NAFTA, CAFTA-DR and bilateral investment treaties in a large number of sectors.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Competition
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory

New competition cooperation framework likely to increase and intensify coordination between authorities in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States

By John Dalzell, John Dalzell, Adrian Magnus, and Sandy Walker | September 15, 2020
  • Administrative Law
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory

Triggers for federal review in a case of mixed metaphors

By Bernie Roth | May 27, 2022
  • International Trade
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory
  • Trade, WTO and Customs

Trade trends 2021

By Paul Lalonde, Sean Stephenson, and Daniela Acevedo | January 23, 2021

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Aboriginal
  • Administrative Law
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Aviation
  • Broadcasting
  • Cannabis
  • Class Action Defense
  • Climate Change
  • Climate Change
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Communications
  • Competition
  • Consumer Products
  • COVID-19
  • Data
  • Drones
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • ESG
  • Event
  • Expropriation
  • Financial
  • FinTech
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • Franchising and Distribution
  • Global Mobility
  • Government Affairs
  • Government Investigations
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • International Trade
  • Judicial Review
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mining
  • Modern Slavery
  • Municipal
  • National Security
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Product regulation
  • Professional Liability
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
  • Real Estate
  • Regulatory
  • Russia
  • Sanctions
  • Securities
  • Smart Cities
  • Supply chain
  • Tax
  • Technology
  • Technology, Media and Communications
  • Trade and Economic Sanctions
  • Trade, WTO and Customs
  • Transportation
  • Ukraine/Russia
  • White Collar Crime
Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site