Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

Canadian Regulatory Trends to Watch in 2020 – Competition/Antitrust Law

By Sandy Walker and Simon Kupi
March 10, 2020
  • Class Action Defense
  • Competition
  • Data
  • Regulatory
  • Technology
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In 2020, Canada’s Competition Bureau can be expected to sharpen its focus on the digital economy—a clear priority for Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell. Shortly after Mr. Boswell’s March 2019 appointment, the Commissioner declared his “big picture” vision to be “for the Bureau to be among the world’s leading competition agencies in terms how we do all aspects of our work in the digital economy.” As we discuss below, this is one of several trends that could see the scaling up of competition enforcement this year in Canada.

A heightened focus on digital issues

The most visible of the Bureau’s initiatives on the digital front was a September 2019 “call-out” to market participants for information on potential anti-competitive conduct in key digital markets, such as online search, social media, display advertising and online marketplaces. This “tip line”-like approach was an unusual move for the Bureau. With written submissions in the call-out process now in, all eyes are on the Commissioner as to whether 2020 will see an uptick in digital-related enforcement cases or advocacy. 

An early sign of a potential digital enforcement trend came this past summer, when private equity firm Thoma Bravo saw the Bureau challenge—post-closing—its acquisition of oil and gas reserves software maker Aucerna. The firm quickly came to a consent agreement resolution with the Commissioner, committing to divest an Aucerna rival that it owned. On the Bureau’s theory of the case, the Aucerna deal represented a “merger to monopoly” in a market for reserves data it described as “critical” to the business and compliance requirements of Canadian oil and gas producers. 

A further development was the release of the Competition Tribunal’s decision in the Vancouver Airport Authority (VAA) case. Among other things, VAA clarifies the competition law criteria that apply to actors that exercise control over, or set the rules of, a market without competing in it, including what constitutes a “plausible competitive interest” in a market sufficient to support abuse of dominance allegations. These criteria may be important in any future Bureau action concerning a digital platform. That said, the VAA decision set a low bar for the “plausible competitive interest” required for the Commissioner to pursue a case, but did underscore the importance of having legitimate business justifications for conduct that is challenged as anti-competitive.

The Bureau’s digital focus in 2020 may also draw upon the resources of the “Chief Digital Enforcement Officer” position the organization created in 2019, with its hiring of an ex-IBM data and AI specialist. This officer’s role is to ensure the Bureau has the technology, tools and techniques to capture evidence of deceptive marketing practices online or cartels/bid-rigging, monitor threats and underlying emerging technologies and work with domestic and international partners in digital enforcement.

Finally, 2020 may see the creation of the role of the Data Commissioner, as outlined in the mandate letter to Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry. The mandate letter states that the Data Commissioner will oversee new regulations for large digital companies to better protect people’s personal data and encourage greater competition in the digital marketplace. How this commissioner’s responsibilities will align with those of the Commissioner of Competition is not clear at this time.

Non-notifiable mergers increasingly on the Bureau’s radar

Another recent organizational change for the Bureau was the rebranding of its Merger Notification Unit as the “Merger Intelligence and Notification Unit.” In announcing the change, the Bureau noted its intent to more actively scrutinize mergers falling below the Competition Act’s thresholds for notification. 

Consistent with the announcement, many observers noted an increase in Bureau interest in non-notifiable mergers in mid-to-late 2019, such as its document production order relating to the acquisition of Encore Event Technologies by PSAV in the audiovisual services market. The Bureau’s legal authority to investigate or challenge non-notifiable mergers is not new; in fact, one such case was litigated to the Supreme Court of Canada several years ago. However, the Bureau’s new enforcement tack should cause companies looking to acquire Canadian businesses to more proactively assess and address competition risks in 2020.

An expanded scope for competition class actions

The Supreme Court of Canada’s highly anticipated decision in Pioneer Corp. v Godfrey can also be expected to have consequences for competition enforcement going forward. The Court found that so-called “umbrella” purchasers that buy goods or services from non-cartelists in a sector affected by price-fixing could bring private actions under the Competition Act to seek damages. It also found that the discoverability principle was available to extend the two-year limitation period under the statute, and that a private right of action was not intended to displace other common law or equitable remedies available to plaintiffs. Finally, the Court established a lower bar for showing a loss at the class certification stage than in the United States. 

Each of these developments can be expected to spur on private class actions in Canadian courts in 2020 and beyond.

To read the comprehensive Dentons’ pick of Canadian Regulatory Trends to Watch in 2020 report, click here.

This post was originally published on dentons.com.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Sandy Walker

About Sandy Walker

Sandy Walker is co-Chair of Dentons' Competition and Foreign Investment Review group and is recognized as one of the country’s leading competition and Investment Canada Act lawyers. Sandy's practice focuses on securing government approvals for mergers and acquisitions from the Competition Bureau, Investment Canada and other regulatory agencies, including navigating complex “net benefit to Canada” reviews and the national security review process on behalf of foreign investors, both state-owned and private sector.

All posts Full bio

Simon Kupi

About Simon Kupi

Simon practices in Dentons’ Energy Regulation group in Calgary and in the firm’s national Competition and Foreign Investment group. In his energy and utilities practice, Simon focuses on economic regulatory, public, Indigenous and environmental law. In his competition practice, he assists with Competition Act and Investment Canada Act merger clearances as well as with civilly-reviewable and criminal matters.  In addition, Simon advises on issues arising under  Alberta consumer protection legislation.

Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • International Trade
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory
  • Trade, WTO and Customs

United States re-imposes aluminum tariffs on certain Canadian aluminum products

By Paul Lalonde and Sean Stephenson | August 14, 2020
  • Aboriginal
  • Administrative Law
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • Regulatory

Fort McKay First Nation v Prosper Petroleum Ltd: The Alberta Court of Appeal directs the AER to consider constitutional Aboriginal rights issues outside of the duty to consult

By Bernie Roth, Laura Estep, Simon Kupi, and Joe Sebestyen | May 4, 2020
  • COVID-19
  • Data
  • Health
  • Privacy

Privacy law in the context of pandemics

By Chantal Bernier and Kirsten Thompson | March 23, 2020

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Aboriginal
  • Administrative Law
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Aviation
  • Broadcasting
  • Cannabis
  • Class Action Defense
  • Climate Change
  • Climate Change
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Communications
  • Competition
  • Consumer Products
  • COVID-19
  • Data
  • Drones
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • ESG
  • Event
  • Expropriation
  • Financial
  • FinTech
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • Franchising and Distribution
  • Global Mobility
  • Government Affairs
  • Government Investigations
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • International Trade
  • Judicial Review
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mining
  • Modern Slavery
  • Municipal
  • National Security
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Product regulation
  • Professional Liability
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
  • Real Estate
  • Regulatory
  • Russia
  • Sanctions
  • Securities
  • Smart Cities
  • Supply chain
  • Tax
  • Technology
  • Technology, Media and Communications
  • Trade and Economic Sanctions
  • Trade, WTO and Customs
  • Transportation
  • Ukraine/Russia
  • White Collar Crime
Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site