Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

Hook, line and Sinker: Canada issues $15 million fine for Fisheries Act violations

By Alex MacWilliam, Dina Awad, and Kate Wiltse
June 29, 2022
  • Environmental
  • Mining
  • Regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Canada’s stated intention to crack down on environmental offenders has once again been felt by industry stakeholders, with the recent issuance of a CA$15 million fine stemming from violations under the federal Fisheries Act and the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations (now the Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent Regulations).

As previously discussed by Dentons here, the Government of Canada released A Discussion Paper Regarding the Environmental Fines and Sentencing Regime: 10 Years Later, in 2021, which provided a detailed analysis of the rise of environmental fines under ten pieces of federal environmental legislation. This discussion paper pre-dated the largest fine in Canadian environmental law – the CA$60 million penalty imposed under the Fisheries Act on Teck Coal in March 2021, for the unlawful depositing of 2.2 billion cubic metres of coal mine waste rock, a deleterious substance, into a local river.

Just over one year later, on June 10, 2022,  two Canadian corporations were fined a total of CA$15 million by the Court of Québec after a conviction on 93 charges and 5 charges, respectively, under the Fisheries Act and the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations.

The charges, discussed in the decision of the Court, stemmed from incidents at a mining complex in dating back from 2011 to 2013. Upon investigation of a dike rupture at the mining complex, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) uncovered 33 unauthorized deposits of deleterious substances into water contrary to subsection 36(3) of the Fisheries Act. This provision prohibits the deposit of a deleterious substance of any type into water frequented by fish. The waters in question flowed into what is considered to be one of the most important rivers for Atlantic salmon in North America.  

The ECCC investigation also revealed that one of the corporations had not complied with the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations, as it had not been declaring the results of its effluent monitoring tests. It was also found that the corporation had concealed from the authorities a number of unauthorized deposits of deleterious substances into water containing fish, causing the ECCC to have an inaccurate view of the entire situation. This was a violation of subsection 63(1) of the Fisheries Act, which provides that no person shall make a false or misleading statement, whether orally or in writing, to an authority who is carrying out duties or functions under the Act. The corporation was also found guilty of failing to submit quarterly effluent monitoring reports within the prescribed timeframe, a violation of subsections 21(1) of the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations.

Lastly, the two corporations were also found guilty of failing to conduct proper testing during these deposits of deleterious substances, violating paragraph 14(1)(b) and subsection 17(1) of the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations.

As a result of these convictions, both corporations will be added to the Environmental Offenders Registry, a registry which contains information on firms that have been convicted for violations of certain federal environmental laws. The entire CA$15 million in fines will be paid to the Government of Canada Environmental Damages Fund and will go towards achieving restoration of damage to the natural environment and wildlife conservation in Canada.

This multi-million dollar fine is just the latest example in a growing line of cases that continue to emphasize Canada’s focus and increasing emphasis on enforcing environmental laws, and ensuring compliance with these laws by both corporations and individuals alike. A main takeaway from this decision is that environmental violations, if not caught and accurately reported at an early stage, can lead to hefty cumulative fines.

Dentons Canada will continue to track developments in environmental law and provide updates. Stay up-to-date with all insights and guidance from our environmental team. If you have any questions about this insight, please reach out to Alex MacWilliam, Dina Awad, or Kate Wiltse.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Alex MacWilliam

About Alex MacWilliam

Alex is Canada lead for the global Environment and Natural Resources group and the global Climate Change Strategies practice group. He regularly advises Canadian and international clients on all legal issues relating to the environment. These include regulatory approvals, compliance, contaminated land, climate change, transportation of dangerous goods, dealing with regulatory agencies, responses to government policies and the development of internal environmental practices and systems. In 2015, Alex was appointed by the Government of Alberta to be the Chair of the Environmental Appeals Board.

All posts Full bio

Dina Awad

About Dina Awad

Dina Awad is a partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution and Regulatory practice groups, with a practice focused on environmental, infrastructure, health and safety, and public-law disputes.

All posts Full bio

Kate Wiltse

About Kate Wiltse

Kate Wiltse is an associate in Dentons’ Regulatory group. Based in Calgary, her practices include environmental and energy regulation, environmental litigation and transactional work and renewable energy.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Consumer Products
  • Judicial Review
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Product Regulation
  • Regulatory

British Columbia Supreme Court reaffirms broad supervisory powers of the BC Farm Industry Review Board

By Morgan Camley, Emma Irving, Mélanie Power, and Kathryn Gullason | January 8, 2025
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • Government Affairs

GHG emissions and the Canadian Constitution – Defending against the Trojan horse

By Gord Tarnowsky and David P. Konkin | March 17, 2020
  • Environmental
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Regulatory

Climate Change litigation in Canada: Recent developments – Podcast

By Alex MacWilliam, Kelly Osaka, and David P. Konkin | November 29, 2019

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Check out more at Dentons.com

No single rulebook: AI risk in cross-border Canada-US M&A – Part one

Artificial intelligence is no longer the concern of a niche category of self-described “AI businesses” – it is now embedded across the economy and surfaces in virtually every transaction. Increasingly, [...]

Canadian Securities Administrators Consultation Paper 51-406: A ground-up review of public company regulation in Canada

Canada: On July 16, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators (the CSA) published CSA Consultation Paper 51-406, Modernizing the Regulation of Public Companies (the Consultation Paper), the broadest review of the continuous [...]

Ontario enacts the <em>Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026</em> to streamline planning processes and accelerate housing delivery

Canada: This alert provides an overview of key legislative changes arising from the Act and highlights practical implications for developers and municipalities. [...]

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2026 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site