Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

It’s not all about taxes: The 2021 federal budget resurrects procurement policy

By Paul Lalonde, Sean Stephenson, and Daniela Acevedo
April 28, 2021
  • Financial
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
  • Regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On April 19, 2021, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland tabled the Liberal Government’s 2021 budget (Budget 2021). Budget 2021 is titled “A Recovery Plan for Jobs, Growth, and Resilience” and unveils CA$101.4 billion in new spending, along with certain policy developments. One of these new policy developments is Canada’s procurement for new fighter aircraft.

Budget 2021 reaffirms Canada’s economic interests as a core principle of its procurement policy.

2017 policy

In December 2017, the Government of Canada (the Government) launched a competition process for 88 advanced fighter aircraft, CF-18s, the biggest investment in the Royal Canadian Air Forces in more than 30 years (2017 Procurement). The contract value for the 2017 Procurement is between CA$15 to CA$19 billion. The 2017 Procurement was originally due to close in March 2020. However, in February 2020, the Government granted a 3-month extension to the deadline at the request of the industry. In May 2020, the Government granted another one-month extension due to COVID-19. Finally, on July 31, 2020, the 2017 Procurement closed and three eligible suppliers entered into the bid evaluation phase. The three eligible suppliers are the following:

  • Swedish Government—SAAB AB (publ)—Aeronautics with Diehl Defence GmbH & Co. KG, MBDA UK Ltd., and RAFAEL Advanced Defence Systems Ltd.
  • United States Government—Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company) with Pratt and Whitney
  • United States Government—The Boeing Company with Peraton Canada Corp., CAE Inc., L3 Technologies MAS Inc., GE Canada and Raytheon Canada Limited Services and Support Division

The Government is currently in the evaluation and negotiation stage and anticipates announcing the 2017 Procurement award in 2022, with the first replacement aircraft to be delivered as early as 2025. However, until permanent replacement aircraft are in place and fully operational, the Government invested to continue to deliver its missions and meet international obligations until 2032 by purchasing 18 F/A-18 fighter aircraft from the Government of Australia. Further, on June 16, 2020, the United States Government announced its intent to provide goods and services to support the extension project.

Through the 2017 Procurement competition process, it was the Government’s priority to get the right aircraft at the right price, with a goal to maximize economic benefits for Canadians. In terms of bids assessment, beyond the key evaluation points such as cost, technical requirements, and industrial, technological, and economic benefits, one of the key criteria was potential harm to Canada’s economic interests. The Government stated that when bids were to be assessed, any bidder responsible for harm to Canada’s economic interests would be “at a distinct disadvantage”. Thus, any bidder that would pose any harm to Canadian corporations and subsequently, the Canadian economy would be penalized in the process. However, no indication was made as to how this harm would be calculated.

Budget 2021 procurement policy

Minister Freeland reanimated and restated the 2017 policy in Budget 2021. In section 9.3, Budget 2021 states:

“Budget 2021 confirms the government will apply this policy to major military and Coast Guard procurements going forward. Companies found to have prejudiced Canada’s economic interests through trade challenges will have points deducted from their procurement bid score at a level proportional to the severity of the economic impact to a maximum penalty. This policy will protect Canada’s economic interests and make sure the government does business with trusted partners who value doing business with Canada.”

This policy makes good on previous statements made to this effect related to subsidies and civil aircraft. In April 2017, Boeing filed a trade complaint with the U.S. Commerce Department alleging its business was being harmed because the Government unfairly subsidized Bombardier’s C Series passenger jet. At the peak of the dispute, former President Trump issued an order to impose a 300 per cent duty on Bombardier jets. The Government retaliated by creating the 2017 Policy regarding the penalization of companies that harm Canada’s Economic interest.  In the end, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled against Boeing and Europe’s Airbus took the majority stake in the C Series passenger jet.

This policy of retaliation, while not new, is being reinstated and reaffirmed with the Budget 2021. However, this practice is arguably inconsistent with Canada’s World Trade Organization obligations as it can be conceived as retaliation for accessing domestic or international dispute resolution for trade. This runs contrary to the Government’s support for a rules based international system.


Key considerations

So far, Public Services and Procurement Canada has not provided further clarification or commentary on the 2021 Budget’s procurement policy. However, defence and security contractors should stay informed on the development and implementation of this policy as it may have a significant impact on bidder scoring in major capital projects undertaken by the Government of Canada.  

Further, in keeping with a “Canada-first” approach, Budget 2021 also proposes to leverage procurement opportunities. These opportunities include:

  • Increased funding used to modernize federal procurement and to create opportunities for specific communities by diversifying the federal supplier base;
  • Incorporating accessibility considerations into federal procurement, ensuring goods and services are accessible by design; and
  • Leveraging supplier diversity opportunities through domestic procurement, such as running competitions open to businesses run by Canadians from equity-deserving groups.

According to the Government, all these opportunities will contribute to a more inclusive Canadian economy. While the overall objective may be laudable, how the opportunities might translate into preferences for certain suppliers or classes of suppliers in specific procurements remains to be seen.

The Dentons International Trade team keeps abreast of leading global developments. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to Paul Lalonde, Anca Sattler, Sean Stephenson or Daniela Acevedo with any inquiries.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Paul Lalonde

About Paul Lalonde

Paul Lalonde joined Dentons Canada LLP’s Toronto office in 2014 as a Partner. He focuses on government contracting law, international trade, anti-corruption and international arbitration. Mr. Lalonde is one of Canada’s leading experts on government procurement. He has represented clients in numerous government contracting disputes, including before the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, the Federal Court of Canada and provincial tribunals. His expertise encompasses anti-dumping and countervail investigations, customs, import and export controls, international sanctions, anti-corruption compliance and investigations and international business.

All posts Full bio

Sean Stephenson

About Sean Stephenson

Sean Stephenson is a senior associate in our Corporate group, where he focuses on international trade, investment, anti-corruption, procurement and public international law. Throughout his practice, Sean has gained extensive experience in investment treaty arbitrations, including acting in multiple cases under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules with respect to all phases of proceedings in complex disputes in the Americas and Europe. He has acted in and advised on cases under the NAFTA, CAFTA-DR and bilateral investment treaties in a large number of sectors.

All posts Full bio

Daniela Acevedo

About Daniela Acevedo

Daniela Acevedo (She/Her/Hers) is an associate in the Corporate group at Dentons Canada LLP. Her practice focuses on corporate and commercial law, mergers and acquisitions, international trade and public international law.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Broadcasting
  • Communications
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory

Next steps for Bill C-11, An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act

By Margot E. Patterson | March 20, 2023
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • Regulatory

The Supreme Court of Canada finds the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act constitutional

By Gord Tarnowsky, Stéphane Beaulac, Dina Awad, and David P. Konkin | March 26, 2021
  • Administrative Law
  • Judicial Review
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory

Court holds that Ontario must comply with international agreements in bid process

By Robert Kligman | November 7, 2022

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Aboriginal
  • Administrative Law
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Aviation
  • Broadcasting
  • Cannabis
  • Class Action Defense
  • Climate Change
  • Climate Change
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Communications
  • Competition
  • Consumer Products
  • COVID-19
  • Data
  • Drones
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • ESG
  • Event
  • Expropriation
  • Financial
  • FinTech
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • Franchising and Distribution
  • Global Mobility
  • Government Affairs
  • Government Investigations
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • International Trade
  • Judicial Review
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mining
  • Modern Slavery
  • Municipal
  • National Security
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Product regulation
  • Professional Liability
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
  • Real Estate
  • Regulatory
  • Russia
  • Sanctions
  • Securities
  • Smart Cities
  • Supply chain
  • Tax
  • Technology
  • Technology, Media and Communications
  • Trade and Economic Sanctions
  • Trade, WTO and Customs
  • Transportation
  • Ukraine/Russia
  • White Collar Crime
Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site