Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

“Not so fast!” – Canada announces extended national security reviews of foreign investments

By Simon Kupi, Sandy Walker, Adam Goodman, and Barry Zalmanowitz
August 13, 2020
  • Competition
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The latest shot across the bow of foreign investors looking to invest in Canadian businesses in 2020 came from a July 31 order1 temporarily extending review periods under the national security provisions of the Investment Canada Act (ICA) on COVID-19 grounds. These extensions may require adjustments to deal completion timelines where national security review presents a potential closing risk.

The order was made by Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry (Minister) under the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19) (Time Limits Act),2 which came into force on July 27 as part of a federal omnibus bill, Bill C-20.3 The Time Limits Act provides for temporary extensions to a range of time limits under federal law “in order to prevent any exceptional circumstances that may be produced by [COVID-19] from making it difficult or impossible to meet those time limits” and to prevent any “unfair or undesirable effects” resulting from their expiry.4

The Minister’s order, in addition to modifying other federal time limits or periods, affects the process for ICA national security reviews. Those reviews subject foreign investments to establish, acquire, or otherwise invest in a Canadian business of any size—especially those involving defence applications, critical technology and infrastructure and other sensitive assets—to an evaluation of whether such investments would be “injurious” to Canada’s national security.5 The order makes the following changes to the timing associated with the national security review process:

  • For investments requiring an ICA notification or application for review filing, the order increases the period for an initial screening for national security concerns from 45 days to 60 days post-filing.
  • For investments that do not require an ICA filing, the order increases the period for an initial screening from 45 days to 180 days post-closing.
  • For all investments, the order increases the period of any extended initial review of the investment from 45 days to 90 days following the applicable screening period above.
  • No time limit affected by the order will be extended beyond December 31, 2020.6

The swift passage of the Time Limits Act, and the subsequent issuance of the Minister’s order days later, follow on the heels of a federal policy statement issued at the outset of the COVID-19 crisis indicating heightened scrutiny of investments relating to public health or certain “critical goods and services,” as well as investments by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) (see our previous April ICA update). In addition, a House of Commons committee review of the ICA in June 2020 featured significant discussion of national security risks—particularly in relation to certain foreign state investments.7 While an explanatory note released with the Minister’s order cites COVID-19-related “operational restrictions” affecting both the government and investment parties as justification for the order’s ICA extensions,8 those extensions will equally facilitate a more probing examination of the classes of investment flagged in the government’s earlier policy statement.

It should also be noted that the Time Limits Act allows further orders to be issued extending timelines relevant to the national security review process9 by or before September 30, 2020.10 Such further orders may not be necessary or practical in light of the Minister’s July 31 order. Notwithstanding, there remains a risk that relevant time limits (including limits not affected by the July 31 order) could be further or newly extended to expire as late as December 31, 2020.11 Any further order can also provide for the retroactive application of those extended limits back to March 13, 2020, including with respect to expired review periods.12 While the Minister did not rely upon the retroactivity provision of the Time Limits Act in extending ICA-related timelines in the July 31 order,13 the government’s Investment Review Division is of the view that the order applies to ongoing reviews of investments whose ICA filings were certified before July 31 (i.e., where relevant time limits have not expired prior to that date).14

As a practical matter, the Minister’s order will require parties to transactions that are higher risk from a national security perspective to take the extended timing of ICA processes (as well as the risk of any further extensions noted above) into account when deciding on closing dates and other transactional milestones. In this regard, we stress the importance of developing a legal and government relations strategy as early as possible in transaction planning—especially in the case of SOEs. Doing so can help to mitigate the risk of an investment encountering significant delays, facing onerous government-imposed conditions or being blocked outright in the ICA’s national security process.

Dentons’ Competition and Foreign Investment Review group has extensive experience with the ICA, including reviews based on national security, for both private-sector entities and SOEs.  For more information, please contact a member of our group listed in the “Key Contacts” sidebar to the right of this article.


1 Order respecting Time Limits and Other Periods Established by or Under Certain Acts and Regulations for which the Minister of Industry is Responsible (COVID-19) (31 July 2020) [“Order”].

2 SC 2020, c 11, s 11.

3 Bill C-20, An Act respecting further COVID-19 measures, 1st Sess, 43rd Parl, 2020, SC 2020, c 11.

4 Time Limits Act, supra note 2, s 5.

5 For more background, see the discussion of the ICA’s national security review provisions in our April ICA update.

6 See Order, supra note 1, s 13.

7 For the materials from the relevant sessions of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, see here.

8 See the federal government’s Explanatory Note on the order.

9 These timelines include both those noted above in this update as well as those applicable to later stages of the national security review process not covered by the July 31 order. See the Time Limits Act, supra note 2, ss 7(1) and (2) and the ICA row listed in its Schedule providing, among other things, that timelines established by or under s 25.3 of the ICA and the National Security Review of Investments Regulations, SOR/2009-271, are subject to extension by order.

10 Time Limits Act, ibid, s 9.

11 Ibid, s 7(4).

12 Ibid, s 7(5).

13 The Minister did rely upon the retroactivity provision in the parts of the order relating to other federal statutes. See Order, supra note 1, ss 4, 7, 11.

14 See also Government of Canada, “Temporary Extension of Certain Timelines in the National Security Review Process Due to COVID-19” (4 August 2020).

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Simon Kupi

About Simon Kupi

Simon practices in Dentons’ Energy Regulation group in Calgary and in the firm’s national Competition and Foreign Investment group. In his energy and utilities practice, Simon focuses on economic regulatory, public, Indigenous and environmental law.

All posts Full bio

Sandy Walker

About Sandy Walker

Sandy Walker is co-Chair of Dentons' Competition and Foreign Investment Review group and is recognized as one of the country’s leading competition and Investment Canada Act lawyers. Sandy's practice focuses on securing government approvals for mergers and acquisitions from the Competition Bureau, Investment Canada and other regulatory agencies, including navigating complex “net benefit to Canada” reviews and the national security review process on behalf of foreign investors, both state-owned and private sector.

All posts Full bio

Adam Goodman

About Adam Goodman

Adam’s practice focuses on class action defence, cartel defence, and merger clearance under the Competition Act and the Investment Canada Act. He has represented clients at all levels of Ontario and Federal courts. Adam’s experience includes representing clients participating in Canada’s Immunity and Leniency programs, leading internal investigations, and representing clients in contentious public inquiries.

All posts Full bio

Barry Zalmanowitz

About Barry Zalmanowitz

Barry Zalmanowitz is a member of Dentons Canada LLP's Edmonton office and co-chair of the Firm’s national Competition Law group. He advises and represents clients in all aspects of the Competition Act, including mergers and notifiable transactions, conspiracy and other criminal provisions, private damage actions, reviewable practices and misleading advertising. He also represents clients in compliance with the Investment Canada Act and establishes competition and antitrust compliance programs and policies.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Regulatory

Competition Act and Investment Canada Act thresholds for Canadian M&A transactions confirmed for 2020

By Adam Goodman, Sandy Walker, Barry Zalmanowitz, and Simon Kupi | April 10, 2020
  • International Trade
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory
  • Trade, WTO and Customs

Trade trends 2021

By Paul Lalonde, Sean Stephenson, and Daniela Acevedo | January 23, 2021
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • ESG
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Regulatory

Dentons Pick of Canadian Regulatory Trends to Watch in 2022

By Sandy Walker | February 1, 2022

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Aboriginal
  • Administrative Law
  • Anti-Corruption
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Aviation
  • Broadcasting
  • Cannabis
  • Class Action Defense
  • Climate Change
  • Climate Change
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Communications
  • Competition
  • COVID-19
  • Data
  • Drones
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • ESG
  • Event
  • Expropriation
  • Financial
  • FinTech
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • Franchising and Distribution
  • Global Mobility
  • Government Affairs
  • Government Investigations
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • International Trade
  • Judicial Review
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Mining
  • Modern Slavery
  • Municipal
  • National Security
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Product regulation
  • Professional Liability
  • Public Policy and Regulation
  • Public Procurement
  • Real Estate
  • Regulatory
  • Russia
  • Sanctions
  • Securities
  • Smart Cities
  • Supply chain
  • Tax
  • Technology
  • Technology, Media and Communications
  • Trade and Economic Sanctions
  • Trade, WTO and Customs
  • Transportation
  • Ukraine/Russia
  • White Collar Crime
Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site