Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

Consultation notice: Canada Border Services Agency seeks your input on future regulatory amendments to the Valuation for Duty Regulations

By Paul Lalonde, Sean Stephenson, and Daniela Acevedo
June 20, 2021
  • International Trade
  • Regulatory
  • Trade, WTO and Customs
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is giving interested stakeholders the opportunity to participate in a consultation period, which runs from June 4th until July 4th, 2021, which could potentially inform future regulatory amendments to the Valuation for Duty Regulations (the Regulations).

Background

On April 19, 2021, Deputy Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland tabled the Liberal Government’s 2021 budget (Budget 2021). One of the proposed changes on Budget 2021 was amendments to the Customs Act (the Act). Budget 2021 proposed changes to the Act to improve duty and tax collection, by ensuring that goods are valued in a fair and consistent manner by all importers as a means to level the playing field between domestic and foreign businesses. As a result, Bill C-30, Budget Implementation Act, 2021, No. 1, introduced on April 30, 2021, includes a legislative amendment to subsection 45(1) of the Act. Currently, subsection 45(1) of the Act does not contain a definition of the phrase “sold for export to Canada”. The proposed legislative amendment allows this definition to be assigned by the Regulations to further assist in the calculation of the value for duty.

A “value for duty” must be declared for all goods imported to Canada in accordance with the Act, regardless of the circumstances of their importation. The value for duty is the base figure on which duty is calculated. There are six methods of customs valuation identified in the Act, the primary being the transaction value method:

  • Transaction value method (Section 48 of the Act)
  • Transaction value of identical goods method (Section 49 of the Act)
  • Transaction value of similar goods method (Section 50 of the Act)
  • Deductive value method (Section 51 of the Act)
  • Computed Value method (Section 52 of the Act)
  • Residual basis of appraisal method (Section 53 of the Act)

While technical, further precision on the definition of goods “sold for export to Canada” has the potential to have significant impact on customs valuation and the price deemed paid or payable for customs purposes. Further, ensuring practical and business consistency with any future definitions of “purchaser in Canada”, “resident,” and “permanent establishment” will be crucial for businesses engaged in cross border trade.

Your input

With this proposed legislative amendment, the CBSA is looking for input on the following measures:

  1. Defining the scope of “sold for export to Canada” to specify the relevant transaction for export which forms the basis of the transaction value of the goods.

This proposal would ensure that the value for duty of imported goods determined under the transaction value method is based on the sale that causes the goods to be exported to Canada. In other words, the last transaction in the commercial chain, irrespective of the chronological order of the sales. Under this proposal, the term “sale” would be constructed in a broad sense, which would include any type of arrangements that causes the goods to be exported to Canada.

  • Clarifying the definition of “purchaser in Canada”, as well as the associated definitions of “resident” and “permanent establishment”, and ensure the relevant sale for export forms the basis of the transaction value of the goods.

This proposal intends to remove any ambiguity on how to qualify as a “permanent establishment”. To qualify, the person would need to:

  • Be the purchaser of the goods imported to Canada;
  • Have a fixed place of business in Canada, through which the goods are purchased; and
  • Have the authority to enter into the arrangement/sale (the permanent establishment could not, under this proposal, be a conduit in the sale).

A non-resident importer, who does not have a permanent establishment would only qualify as a purchaser in Canada if the goods were imported:

  • For their own use; or
  • On speculation of future sales (meaning the sale of the goods to a person in Canada was not arranged in any way before the goods arrived in Canada).

Your Dentons International Trade Team will be closely monitoring the public consultation, the results of which may have a significant impact on importers. If you are an importer, a Canadian retailer, or any other person potentially affected by the proposed changes, you may wish to submit feedback during the public consultation. If you require assistance with this, or on anything else connected to customs compliance, we are happy to help. Please contact Paul Lalonde, Anca Sattler, Sean Stephenson or Daniela Acevedo for more information.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Paul Lalonde

About Paul Lalonde

Paul Lalonde joined Dentons Canada LLP’s Toronto office in 2014 as a Partner. He focuses on government contracting law, international trade, anti-corruption and international arbitration. Mr. Lalonde is one of Canada’s leading experts on government procurement. He has represented clients in numerous government contracting disputes, including before the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, the Federal Court of Canada and provincial tribunals. His expertise encompasses anti-dumping and countervail investigations, customs, import and export controls, international sanctions, anti-corruption compliance and investigations and international business.

All posts Full bio

Sean Stephenson

About Sean Stephenson

Sean Stephenson is Counsel focusing on international trade, investment, arbitration, government contracts, anti-corruption, and public international law. Throughout his practice, Sean has gained extensive experience in investment treaty arbitration, including acting in multiple cases under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules with respect to all phases of proceedings in complex disputes throughout the Americas and Europe. He has acted in and advised on cases under the NAFTA, CAFTA-DR, CPTPP and bilateral investment treaties in a large number of sectors.

All posts Full bio

Daniela Acevedo

About Daniela Acevedo

Daniela Acevedo (She/Her/Hers) is an associate in the Corporate group at Dentons Canada LLP. Her practice focuses on corporate and commercial law, mergers and acquisitions, international trade and public international law.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Government Affairs
  • International Trade
  • Regulatory

Canadian Regulatory Trends to Watch in 2020 – Public Affairs

By James Moore | March 10, 2020
  • Professional Liability
  • Regulatory

Supreme Court of Canada refuses to hear appeal challenging zero tolerance rule for health care practitioners

By Dina Awad, Kate Millar, and Justin Okerman | April 21, 2022
  • Energy
  • FinTech
  • Regulatory

The Alberta Energy Regulator requests information regarding cryptocurrency mining operations in Alberta

By George Antonopoulos, Sam Gabor, Kate Wiltse, and Jesse Standing | June 2, 2022

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site