Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

A floodgate of correctness? The Supreme Court of Canada creates a new category of correctness in judicial review

By Laurie Livingstone, David P. Konkin, and Cate White
October 21, 2022
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Judicial Review
  • Regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Only three years after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) refashioned the standard of review in administrative law, the Court has added a new category that attracts the stringent “correctness” review standard: matters where an administrative decision-maker and a court have concurrent jurisdiction. However, this category is not truly new. Concurrent jurisdiction attracted correctness review under the Dunsmuir framework that Vavilov[1] replaced and in which the Court set out five categories that attract correctness review. With the SCC’s decision in Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Entertainment Software Association (SOCAN), there are now six categories where the correctness standard applies.[2]

Read the complete article here.


[1] 2019 SCC 65[Vavilov].

[2] 2022 SCC 30 [SOCAN].

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Laurie Livingstone

About Laurie Livingstone

Laurie Livingstone (She/Her/Hers) is a partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group and practices in both Alberta and Ontario. Her practice focuses on administrative law, appellate advocacy, and complex commercial litigation.

All posts Full bio

David P. Konkin

About David P. Konkin

David is an associate in Dentons’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group, focusing on all manner of business-related litigation including commercial and corporate disputes, regulatory appeals, fraud and anti-corruption/bribery. David also provides advice on litigation related aspects of large transactions.

All posts Full bio

Cate White

About Cate White

Cate White is an associate in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group in Dentons’ Calgary office. Her practice covers commercial and civil litigation, regulatory disputes, administrative and constitutional law, with a focus on anti-corruption, bribery, compliance reviews and white-collar criminal investigations.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Health
  • Regulatory

Ontario considering introducing new heat stress and air quality requirements under the Occupational Health and Safety Act

By Emily Kroboth and Adrian Miedema | October 17, 2023
  • Consumer Products
  • Judicial Review
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Product Regulation
  • Regulatory

British Columbia Supreme Court reaffirms broad supervisory powers of the BC Farm Industry Review Board

By Morgan Camley, Emma Irving, Mélanie Power, and Kathryn Gullason | January 8, 2025
  • Competition
  • Foreign Investment Review
  • National Security
  • Regulatory

Further tightening of Canada’s National Security Review process

By Sandy Walker | December 8, 2022

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site