Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

The latest information and developments on regulatory law across Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canada Regulatory Review

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Dentons COVID-19 hub

A floodgate of correctness? The Supreme Court of Canada creates a new category of correctness in judicial review

By Laurie Livingstone, David P. Konkin, and Cate White
October 21, 2022
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Judicial Review
  • Regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Only three years after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) refashioned the standard of review in administrative law, the Court has added a new category that attracts the stringent “correctness” review standard: matters where an administrative decision-maker and a court have concurrent jurisdiction. However, this category is not truly new. Concurrent jurisdiction attracted correctness review under the Dunsmuir framework that Vavilov[1] replaced and in which the Court set out five categories that attract correctness review. With the SCC’s decision in Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Entertainment Software Association (SOCAN), there are now six categories where the correctness standard applies.[2]

Read the complete article here.


[1] 2019 SCC 65[Vavilov].

[2] 2022 SCC 30 [SOCAN].

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Laurie Livingstone

About Laurie Livingstone

Laurie Livingstone (She/Her/Hers) is a partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group and practices in both Alberta and Ontario. Her practice focuses on administrative law, appellate advocacy, and complex commercial litigation.

All posts Full bio

David P. Konkin

About David P. Konkin

David is an associate in Dentons’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group, focusing on all manner of business-related litigation including commercial and corporate disputes, regulatory appeals, fraud and anti-corruption/bribery. David also provides advice on litigation related aspects of large transactions.

All posts Full bio

Cate White

About Cate White

Cate White is an associate in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group in Dentons’ Calgary office. Her practice covers commercial and civil litigation, regulatory disputes, administrative and constitutional law, with a focus on anti-corruption, bribery, compliance reviews and white-collar criminal investigations.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Health
  • Marketing/Advertising
  • Product Regulation
  • Regulatory

The next step to a healthier Canada: Legislation proposing to ban advertising “unhealthy” food and beverages directed at children

By Monica Song and Yulia Konarski | November 23, 2022
  • Cannabis
  • Regulatory

Court clarifies required cannabis retail store setback from schools

By Benjamin Iscoe | October 23, 2020
  • International Trade
  • Regulatory
  • Trade, WTO and Customs

Consultation notice: Canada Border Services Agency seeks your input on future regulatory amendments to the Valuation for Duty Regulations

By Paul Lalonde, Sean Stephenson, and Daniela Acevedo | June 20, 2021

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site